Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
22217 e1 xl k fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Abdichtung: beidseitig Synonym: 0167040290000 22217 E1 K Befestigungshlse: AHX317 Bezugsdrehzahl: 3. 450 1 min ueres Breitenma: 36 mm Gewicht: 2590 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 5. 700 1 min Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmiernutueres Breitenma: 6,5 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 150,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "5700. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 36,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Abdichtung: beidseitig |
| Synonym: 0167040290000 22217-E1-K |
| Befestigungshülse: AHX317 |
| Bezugsdrehzahl: 3.450 1/min |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 36 mm |
| Gewicht: 2590 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 5.700 1/min |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaß: 6,5 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 150,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "5700.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 36,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 36,00 |
| E1 Increased Capacity Design |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-11 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-11 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 2.3 |
| Innenmaße: mm 85,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 305000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 325000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "3450.0000" |
| Schwingsiebausführung Keine Schwingsiebausführung |
| XL X-Life |
| AHX317 Befestigungshülse |
| B 36 mm Äußeres Breitenmaße: |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 200 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 325.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 305.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 39.000 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Durchmesser Schmierkanal: 3,2 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 305.000 N |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 3,04 |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 4,53 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 39.000 N |
| Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y: 0,22 |
| Maximaler Durchmesser der Wellenschulter: 99 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 2 mm |
| Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 96 mm |
| Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse: 91 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 2 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 325.000 N |
| Statischer Axiallastfaktor: 2,97 |
| T max 200 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Y 0 2,97 Statischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 1 3,04 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 2 4,53 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| d =a max 99 mm Maximaler Durchmesser der Wellenschulter |
| d =a min 96 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =b min 91 mm Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse |
| d =s 3,2 mm Durchmesser Schmierkanal |
| e 0,22 Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y |
| n G 5.700 1/min Grenzdrehzahl |
| n s 6,5 mm SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| n ϑr 3.450 1/min Bezugsdrehzahl |
| r a max 2 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 2 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 2,56 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1426 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Very handy!
Color: Sliver, Size: S
Love this thing! It is very nice looking along with keeping remotes handy
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for your remotes plus more!
Color: Dark Brown, Size: M
Awesome product. The large sized option holds all our remotes plus my cell phone. Perfect for the coffee table.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
work well
Color: Blossom
these work really well on your screens on your phone and laptop. I keep one of them in my car for the computer screen. there are 4 of them so you can leave them in multiple places and always have one handy. the designs are fun. they clean well with a little pressure. they do not scratch the surfaces. they are nice and soft and small enough to keep in your purse or wherever.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2025
★★★★★ 5
These are handy and effective!
Color: Blossom
These work really well for cleaning phone/tablet screens, the display screen in my car, and any other screen surface. The material is soft and doesn’t scratch, doesn’t require any liquid cleaning product, and does a great job of removing smudges and dust. I like how portable they are-I can keep one in my car, one in my purse, one in my work bag, and one in my nightstand. I’ve reused them multiple times and they have stood up well to multiple uses with no apparent loss of cleaning ability.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 13, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Work great, inexpensive, but…pic just a tad different
Color: Glitter Pink/Black
These work well, were worth the price, and made good stocking stuffers. I took off 1 star, because they appeared somewhat different from the photo. The photo made the glitter ones looked like they had stars as part of the pattern (like a night sky or outer space), but it seems like that effect was added to the photo to enhance the glittery appearance. They are, in fact, very sparkly and not very celestial, so they were just a tad more ‘girly’ than I was expecting. Nothing wrong with glitter and glam—just different from what I thought I was getting. On a positive note, the glitter is sealed in and doesn’t shed, so you won’t be spreading sparkly escapees for the rest of eternity. (I guess I would give 4.5 stars if I could)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 22, 2025