SKU: 31584775997

Olimp - ZMA

$25.96 $28.84
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on communitymontessori.net >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Olimp - ZMADETAILS OLIMP ZMA (120 CAPS) Bevat 810 mg ZMA per serving Zink + Magnesium + Vitamine B6 40 servings per verpakking Beschrijving Wat is Olimp ZMA? ZMA van Olimp bevat 810 mg ZMA. Het bevat: Zink Zink speelt een rol bij de eiwitsynthese en helpt bij het opbouwen van eiwit.* Zink helpt het immuunsysteem.* Zink ondersteund de botten.* Zink is goed voor je haren, is belangrijk voor je huid, en is goed voor je nagels.* *Voorwaarden voor het gebruik van de

DETAILS OLIMP - ZMA (120 CAPS)

  • Bevat 810 mg ZMA per serving
  • Zink + Magnesium + Vitamine B6
  • 40 servings per verpakking 
Beschrijving

Wat is Olimp - ZMA?
ZMA van Olimp bevat 810 mg ZMA. Het bevat:

Zink

  • Zink speelt een rol bij de eiwitsynthese en helpt bij het opbouwen van eiwit.*
  • Zink helpt het immuunsysteem.*
  • Zink ondersteund de botten.*
  • Zink is goed voor je haren, is belangrijk voor je huid, en is goed voor je nagels.*


*Voorwaarden voor het gebruik van de claim
De claim mag alleen worden gebruikt voor levensmiddelen die ten minste een bron van zink zijn zoals bedoeld in de claim BRON VAN [NAAM VAN DE VITAMINE(N)] EN/OF [NAAM VAN HET MINERAAL/DE MINERALEN], zoals vermeld in de bijlage bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1924/2006.

Magnesium

  • Magnesium is goed voor de werking van de spieren.*
  • Magnesium speelt een rol bij het behouden van soepele en sterke spieren.*
  • Magnesium helpt bij vermoeidheid en futloosheid, en kan gebrek aan energie helpen verminderen.*Magnesium is goed voor het behoud van sterke botten.*
  • Magnesium helpt bij de normale eiwitsynthese.*


*Voorwaarden voor het gebruik van de claim
De claim mag alleen worden gebruikt voor levensmiddelen die ten minste een bron van magnesium zijn zoals bedoeld in de claim BRON VAN [NAAM VAN DE VITAMINE(N)] EN/OF [NAAM VAN HET MINERAAL/DE MINERALEN], zoals vermeld in de bijlage bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1924/2006.

Vitamine B6

  • Vitamine B6 is goed voor de eiwitsynthese*
  • Vitamine B6 draagt bij aan een goede energievoorziening in de spieren*
  • Vitamine B6 draagt bij aan de activiteit van hormonen in het lichaam*
  • Vitamine B6 helpt bij moeheid en futloosheid*


*Voorwaarden voor het gebruik van de claim
De claim mag alleen worden gebruikt voor levensmiddelen die ten minste een bron van vitamine B6 zijn zoals bedoeld in de claim BRON VAN [NAAM VAN DE VITAMINE(N)] EN/OF [NAAM VAN HET MINERAAL/DE MINERALEN], zoals vermeld in de bijlage bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1924/2006.


Inhoud
120 capsules - 60 servings 

Smaak
Neutraal 

Gebruik
Je dient dit product in te nemen als aanvulling op de dagelijkse voeding. Neem dagelijks 2 capsules per dag (vrouwen 1 capsule per dag). Het beste is om de capsules op een lege maag 30 tot 60 minuten voor het slapen gaan in te nemen. Indien je voor het slapen proteine neemt of kwark eet, neem dan de capsules 30 minuten voordat je deze eet of drinkt. 


WAT IS VEILIG?
De maximaal veilige dosis voor zink is 25 mg per dag. Dit komt overeen met acht gebakken hamburgers. Bij de veilige dosis gaat het om een gemiddelde waarde, waarbij een ruime marge is genomen. 

Een acuut teveel aan zink is zeldzaam bij mensen. Wanneer er sprake was van een inname van een grote dosis zink in één keer, dan werd dit veroorzaakt door voeding of drank die in contact was gekomen met verzinkte blikken. De symptomen die hierbij optraden waren onder andere misselijkheid, braken, buikkrampen en diarree. Langdurige inname van teveel zink kan leiden tot onder andere anemie (bloedarmoede) en een vermindering van de weerstand.

De maximaal veilige dosis voor magnesium uit supplementen en verrijkte voedingsmiddelen is 250 milligram per dag. Alleen door deze producten kan een overschot aan magnesium optreden. Bij de veilige dosis gaat het om een gemiddelde waarde, waarbij een ruime marge is genomen.

Voor vitamine B6 is een veilige bovengrens vastgesteld van 21 mg per dag. Deze hoeveelheid staat gelijk aan maar liefst 8 kilo aardappelen of 56 bananen.
Dit voedingssupplement is niet geschikt voor kinderen tot en met 17 jaar. 


Over uw gezondheid
U wordt aangeraden om medische vragen, klachten of symptomen tijdig voor te leggen aan uw (huis)arts of andere professionele zorgverleners teneinde professioneel onderzoek, diagnostiek en mogelijk medische zorg te ontvangen.

De supplementeninformatie moet worden gezien als algemene richtlijn die geldt bij niet-ernstige, veelvoorkomende en alledaagse klachten. Omdat ook bij minder ernstige klachten complicaties of bijwerkingen kunnen vóórkomen, is het van belang dat bij twijfel en bij aanhoudende of toenemende klachten professionele medische hulp wordt ingeroepen.

Over zwangerschap en borstvoeding
Als bij een product niet expliciet vermeld staat dat het voor zwangere vrouwen of vrouwen die borstvoeding geven bedoeld is, is het indien u zwanger bent of borstvoeding geeft aan te raden, eerst een arts of andere deskundige te raadplegen alvorens het product te gebruiken.

Over kinderen
Als bij een product niet expliciet vermeld staat dat het voor kinderen bedoeld is, is het aan te raden eerst een arts of andere deskundige te raadplegen alvorens het aan een kind te geven.

Supplement Facts

Voedingswaarde-Informatie

1 capsule  2 capsules  3 capsules 
Zink 10 mg (*100%) 20 mg (*200%) 30 mg (*300%)
Magnesium 150 mg (*40%) 300 mg (*80%) 450 mg (*120%)
Vitamine B6 3,5 mg (*250%) 7 mg (*500%) 10,5 mg (*750%)

 *Referentie-Inname voor volwassenen

Ingrediënten

99,2% ZMA® (zinkmono-L-methioninesulfaat (L-OptiZink®), zinkaspartaat, magnesiumcitraat, magnesiumoxide, pyridoxinehydrochloride - vit. B6), antiklontermiddel - magnesiumstearaat, capsule (gelatine, kleur: E 171).

Waarschuwing

De aanbevolen dagelijkse dosis niet overschrijden. Voedingssupplementen mogen niet worden gebruikt als vervanging voor een gevarieerd en uitgebalanceerd dieet. Een gevarieerd en uitgebalanceerd dieet en een gezonde levensstijl worden aanbevolen. Buiten het bereik van kinderen houden. In het geval van nieraandoeningen, zwangerschap of borstvoeding, wordt een raadpleging van uw arts aanbevolen.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 31584775997

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 2257 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Houston, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013
M
Verified Purchase
michaelshive
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 3
Thought-provoking but misses its "target audience"
Format: Paperback
First, the good. This is a thought-provoking book that takes complex subject matter and makes it very easy to understand. In "The Evolution of Adam" Dr. Enns does an excellent job on many fronts - most notably giving a brief overview of the history of biblical criticism and its importance to the evolution debate. His ability to distill ideas down to the core was impressive. If I had to recommend to someone 50 pages on biblical criticism I might tell them to read the first portion of this book. However, as I read the book I kept wondering how the path he was taking would allow him to argue for an Evangelical perspective (as he says in the introduction). In short, he does not. Not even close. Dr. Enns must not know his target audience very well if he thinks that this book is targeted for Evangelicals. Virtually none of the positions that he espouses in this book are even close to what an Evangelical Christian would be comfortable defending. He has little regard for any historicity behind any of the biblical accounts and frequently tosses out the phrase "most scholars agree" as a trump card. He does a good job of helping understand the culture and history that surrounded the biblical accounts yet in the end the reader is left wondering where story and history actually meet or if possibly the whole thing was simply conjured up for political reasons. In the end, I think the question the reader is left with is "does it matter if anything in the Bible ACTUALLY happened?". How you answer that may well determine how much you enjoy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Peter Enns "Upends" Tradition!
Format: Paperback
One cannot but deeply admire what Peter Enns has managed to produce within the span of less than 150 pages - not counting his endnotes. Kudos as well for his penetrating exegetical insights...to say nothing as regards his courage: few conservative evangelicals (and even fewer fundamentalists) will find the title "The Evolution of Adam" something that warms the heart. And yet what Enns has produced here not only is revolutionary (in a very real sense - see below) but may well prove to be one of the more controversial books on the science/theology debate of recent years. Why so? Primarily because (according to Enns - Part Two of his book) Paul's creative use (in Romans) of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis was primarily for apologetic purposes...a matter that will be discussed in greater detail below. But we begin with Part One. Essentially Part One (four chapters) represents Enns' understanding of the crucial importance Ancient Near Eastern influences exerted upon the biblical writers - the writer/s of the Genesis creation account in particular. Enns (correctly in my view)hammers this point repeatedly for the reader to consider - i.e., the bible (the whole of it) was not written in a cultural vacuum unsullied by the surrounding culture/s of pagan religious thought, whether ancient Sumerian, Babylonian, or Greco-Roman. Indeed, to do otherwise would have been an impossibility - somewhat like trying to walk along the Tibetan foothills while refusing to breathe its polluted 'pagan' air. None of us ever fully escapes the surrounding influences of culture - and the bible was never intended to do so; rather, God (if one believes in biblical inspiration...as Enns does) works fully within the conceptual categories of culture. Hence, the two creation accounts in Genesis come to us fully embedded with the concepts of Ancient Near Eastern thought patterns. Perhaps the most we can say here is that the Genesis accounts represent (in varying ways) the "demythologizing" of prior Ancient Near Eastern accounts: the God of Israel is not to be identified with any aspect (sun, moon, stars, etc.) of the created order. So far so good. There's nothing really new here that hasn't been said already by any number of conservative evangelical scholars. Part Two, however, is something entirely different. Here Enns focuses his attention on Paul's creative use of the Old Testament, seeing as how the death and resurrection of Christ has caused Paul to look at the OT writings from a radically different perspective - Romans 5:12-21 in particular. These verses have a long, long history in the Christian Church as providing the church's understanding of how sin and death entered the world of human existence: we all "inherited" sin and death in and through the disobedience of Adam back in Eden. Not so...says Enns. And here is where his account veers off in a direction entirely different from traditional orthodox belief - for, according to Enns, Paul gave a particular 'Pauline spin' to these verses that cannot be found either in the OT itself, or in the Second Temple Judaism of which Paul himself was a part. Because the death and resurrection of Christ radically altered Paul's understanding of God's redemptive work in the world he (Paul) "found" in the Adam story an ideal explanation for why it is all Jews and Gentiles alike share in the universal experience of sin and death. Therefore, Adam's disobedience in Eden is NOT the cause of the universal human experience of sin and death (per Enns); rather, the story of Adam's disobedience served Paul's apologetic purposes...quite apart from whatever the story's original intention might have been. The true "origin" of sin and death remains a mystery, for the answer is not to be found (indeed if it can be "found" at all!) in the early Genesis account of Adam and Eve. And here is where we encounter the book's controversial nature, for Enns' view represents a dramatic departure from the traditional view - a traditional view that has a rich theological heritage that passes directly through the Reformation all the way back to Augustine. As previously stated, I deeply admire and respect what Enns has done here. For the most part I think he is on the right track. Furthermore, he makes mention of the fact that recent developments in biology have strongly indicated that we cannot possibly trace all modern humans back to an original "Adam and Eve." However, we knew that already...quite apart from modern biology informing us of the fact. Anthropology and paleontology had already amassed considerable evidence that proto-humans and modern humans were spread across the earth long before any conceivable Adam and Eve could have existed. Apparently, however, modern biology speaks with a more powerful voice than anthropology; thus, we are seeing a spate of books recently on the topic of whether or not Adam and Eve were historical - Enns' book being only one of a growing number. (Due to the geneologies in early Genesis we are somewhat limited in "how far back" we can place an Adam and Eve. Placing them 25 to 40 thousand years into the past in order somehow to allow them to be the true ancestors of all modern humans does a grave injustice to the geneologies that plain and simply do not allow for this sort of radical time reversal - a matter that any number of evangelicals, who have done this sort of thing, seem unwilling to appreciate. The early Genesis geneologies, even allowing for some "gaps," serve as a control against such unwarranted time expansion. An Adam and Eve of perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC appears to be about the limit of what we can reasonably expect). In any case, Enns has raised a thorny and difficult issue in a way previous books on the question have not, and I believe his book will contribute substantially to more open theological discussion (one hopes without heated rancor) on the debate. In the meanwhile, some final thoughts. Personally, I find it more than a tad curious that David Rohl (a somewhat controversial Egyptologist) has recently authored a book (From Eden to Exile, Greenleaf Press) in which he strongly defends an historical Adam - and yet Rohl acknowledges that he is an atheist. All this is most strange: an evangelical scholar arguing against an historical Adam while an atheistic historian argues for one! ("What fools these mortals be!") I happen to agree with much of what Enns writes. However, I think Rohl has a point- even though how he fleshes his historical Adam out is somewhat bizarre. For one thing, I'm not entirely comfortable (despite some of Enns' powerful arguments) with a geneology of Jesus in the Gospels that would include "fictious" characters who never even existed. (I might as well inform you that my great, great grandfather was Dr. Jekyll and my great, great, great grandfather was Mr. Hyde). I don't see why getting rid of an historical Adam is at all necessary. Enns himself offers the possibility that OT Israel viewed Adam as their senior partriarch - the man who originally started the "clan." I personally see great possibilities here via leaving Adam within historical existence as Israel's original, grand patriarch. The origin of sin and death via the Adam and Eve story is another matter entirely. Biology and anthropology together appear to just plain and simply rule it out - and sticking Adam back into the age of the Cro-Magnons and Neaderthals in order to "save" the doctrine is a clear instance of an act of sheer desperation. But I see no reason why we necessarily have to conclude that the "origin" of sin and death (if that's the right word even to use...which I'm not even sure about) can only be regarded as lost in the misty past. I think there is a possible way forward here, and even via an historical Adam, while at the same time embracing what Enns is talking about. I think there may well be a way to retain a personal Adam (perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC), while also showing how sin and death had their origin in him...but with an entirely different understanding that is informed by Enns' book. Unfortunately, spelling all that out is - like "The Evolution of Adam" - a book unto itself. And Amazon commentary is not the place where one is allowed to "write a book" - quite apart from how lengthy my own commentary here has been. In the meanwhile...kudos again to Enns for his truly provocative and highly insightful contribution to the cause. His vigorous defense of the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection is profoundly gratifying. Because of his firm stance here no one can accuse him of being unorthodox! (NOTE: Readers interested in a critical analysis of David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: the 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible," and why this book is of such strategic importance for Old Testament studies - scholars in particular, can easily access my recent review of this book (titled "David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History") by clicking on "See All My Reviews" directly above, or by going to the book's Amazon website. Hope you enjoy the read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2012
L
Verified Purchase
Leslie Danner
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
A must-have for students and researchers
Format: Spiral-bound
I use this all the time. The Concise Guide to APA Style (7th Edition) is incredibly helpful, easy to navigate, and much less overwhelming than flipping through the full manual. Great quick reference for papers, citations, and formatting.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kapplez
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for learning APA format
Format: Spiral-bound
If you are one learning how to write, cite and use references in APA format this is the perfect book for you. It literally breaks down everything for you and has examples of what to do. It has an example essay if you need something to reference as well. I'd recommend this book to anyone that has a strict professor or that is learning how to write APA.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 15, 2026

recommand products

2-Delige Ronde Marmeren Salontafel (zwart/zilver)Ø80/60cm
173.50
Egg hanglamp
199.00
Touwen Hanglamp Bamboe
137.00
Bio-ethanol brander 36 cm
225.00
Diner Bord Nostalgisch
39.95