Pay in installments of $16.72 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1-5/8" Two-Piece Split Clamp-Type Shaft Collar, 316 Stainless SteelCan be placed anywhere on shaft Smooth bore protects shafts from damage Superior holding power over set screw type collars Offered in High Strength, Low Profile and Heavy Duty styles Stocked in a variety of materials 2 Piece Clamp Type Shaft Collars are for use on standard round shafts, hard or soft, as well as on thin wall tube or over a split hub. They can be completely disassembled and placed anywhere on a shaft. Precision machined, non marring,
- Can be placed anywhere on shaft
- Smooth bore protects shafts from damage
- Superior holding power over set-screw type collars
- Offered in High Strength, Low Profile and Heavy Duty styles
- Stocked in a variety of materials
- Steel
- Stainless Steel
- Aluminum
- Nylon
- Delrin
- High Strength: Clamp screw does not protrude beyond the outside diameter (OD)
- Low Profile: Clamp screw protrudes beyond the OD
- Heavy Duty: Uses larger clamp screw and has larger OD for 2X holding power
Specifications
|
Part Number |
8C110 |
|
Series |
Signature |
|
Material |
316 Stainless Steel |
|
Alloy |
316/316L |
|
Finish |
Shiny |
|
Type |
Low Profile |
|
Approximate Weight |
0.70 lb |
|
Country of Origin |
USA |
|
UPC Code |
662786025389 |
|
RoHS2 Compliant |
Yes |
|
REACH Compliant |
Yes |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
New formula
Size: 1.6 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Style: New and Improved Formula!
I love the original aqua cream but it seems they have changed the formula and it is a much thinner, more liquidy product. The scent has also changed, though it’s fairly neutral, and it now comes in a smaller glass container compared to the original plastic.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Amazing Product
Size: 0.42 Fl Oz (Pack of 6)
My absolute favorite lotion. My only regret is it doesn’t come in a larger container! Makes your skin so soft, it absorbs in the skin very nicely and smells amazing. It lasts all day and doesn’t leave skin feeling greasy. Buy it and thank me later
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Moisturizing
Size: 0.42 Fl Oz (Pack of 6)
Smooth and silky
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Best lotion I have ever used!
Size: 2.53 Ounce (Pack of 1)
If you like a very strong fragrance, you will love this. This smell more like chocolate. I absolutely love the smell.
It's a little oily when you first put it on, but after about 10 minutes there is no stickiness. It's really good at keeping your skin soft. If you have ashy spots, like elbows, this will get rid of that within a couple applications. This is also thicker consistency, whereas the "Radiant" version is watery.
The Radiant version is easy to find, but this version is harder to find. So, if you like it, I would recommend you by enough to last. I get the feeling this is not going to be available soon.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Great lotion and absorbant
Size: 0.42 Fl Oz (Pack of 6)
Grewt lotion and price point. Storage last winter a few lotions absorbed air wuality. A 3 or 4 pack nay be more work better.?
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2026