Pay in installments of $10.19 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1949 - 1951 Ford Full-Size Rear Axle Lines Steel - GRA4901OMRear Axle Lines For 49 51 Ford Rear Axle Lines Steel. Our Rear Axle Brake Lines are mounted on the axle going to the left and right rear wheels. These will either connect to a caliper hose or thread directly into a wheel cylinder. All lines come Pre Bent and flared with the correct threaded fittings which reduces your install time tremendously. Our mild steel lines are Galphan coated for added protection. Our stainless steel lines are T304 but are of
Rear Axle Lines For 49-51 Ford Rear Axle Lines Steel. Our Rear Axle Brake Lines are mounted on the axle going to the left and right rear wheels. These will either connect to a caliper hose or thread directly into a wheel cylinder.
All lines come Pre-Bent and flared with the correct threaded fittings which reduces your install time tremendously.
Our mild steel lines are Galphan coated for added protection. Our stainless-steel lines are T304 but are of a special softer blend to help with any possible leaks.
Details:
- Applications:
- 1949-1951 Ford Full-Size (Custom, Custom Deluxe, Country Squire, etc.)
- 1949-1951 Meteor Full-Size Models (Canada Only)
- Material: Steel
- Finish: Galfan Coated
- Location: Rear
- Rear Axle Brake Lines
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 22 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Needed replacement, 2nd one works OK
The first one I received had a broken latching mechanism. Not a shipping issue, as the box was fine, it just wouldn't latch the attachments because the mechanism wouldn't come all the way out. After getting a replacement the 2nd one worked better. It has 3 settings for soft, normal, and pulse. For me, the normal put out the best force for clearing out bits. After washing with it for about 30 seconds though I still don't feel it cleans we well as real floss, or even a waterpik, but it does help after brushing. I will add it to my routine as it does help flush out some things, but it won't be replacing my flossing. It is sort of portable, in that can be packed away and holds a charge, but it's still pretty large and takes up a good amount of space in a toiletry bag. It's not bad, but not really outstanding either.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2024
★★★★★ 5
I like this better than my name brand unit
🔵 Features:
The water pick boasts a generously sized reservoir, which is a standout feature. It also comes with a convenient USB charger, offers 3 speed settings (normal, soft, and pulse), and features quick and easy detachable heads.
🔵 Power:
In terms of power, comparing it to my current unit revealed no noticeable differences in pressure or volume to the naked eye. Both units effortlessly deliver a stream of water up to 12 feet.
🔵 Heads:
The water pick includes a plethora of heads, more than most people would likely need. Personally, I would have preferred a lifetime supply of the simple angled head picks, but the variety provided caters to all preferences.
🔵 Overall:
After using it for a few days, I found that it performs admirably. When placed side by side with my old unit, I consistently reach for the 7AM2M unit, primarily due to its larger reservoir. In all other aspects, I find them comparable, and I wholeheartedly recommend this water pick to others.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Well designed portable water flosser that's holding up so far
There are a number of such portable water flossers on Amazon, but this is one of the better ones IMO. The water pressure is adequate, with enough settings to allow you to ramp up (or keep using on a lower setting if desired). One nice feature is that the tank detaches easily and this makes filling under a tap easier than other units which don't have an easily detached tank. The tank shape is also a bit fatter so it's not too long along any one dimension. The tank capacity of 300 ml is adequate for a single use.
The standard suite of flosser heads are included - flossing itself, peridontal, and one for braces. The tongue cleaner attachment is also there but I prefer to use a separate tongue cleaner tool. Charging is via USB-C and while the port isn't super water proof, there's no damage to the unit yet. Battery life is typical at about 20-30 days with twice a day usage.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2024
★★★★★ 1
Quit working in a month
Bought one. It quit working. They sent another… it never worked right before finally dying on me the same way. Looks like it’s not even an available product anymore. But if it ever does come back.. don’t buy it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Not what I expected!
I have never used a dental flosser before, and it showed by the mess I made haha.
I can say, this isn't for me, but I can see the appeal. It is relatively lightweight and comes with a lot of different attachments. Loading it up with water is easy and doesn't take much effort.
I would call this portable, even though it is a little big.
I can only stand the "soft mode". If I choose any other, my mouth is overwhelmed.
Overall, I would definitely recommend this if you have experience with dental flossers. It was hard to use at first but you get the hang of it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2024