2012-2014 Toyota Sienna 2.7 Engine Balance Shaft 13620-36020 1AR-FE 2AR-FE
SKU: 71506998362

2012-2014 Toyota Sienna 2.7 Engine Balance Shaft 13620-36020 1AR-FE 2AR-FE

$106.10 $117.89
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on communitymontessori.net >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

2012-2014 Toyota Sienna 2.7 Engine Balance Shaft 13620-36020 1AR-FE 2AR-FEEngine Balance Shaft Fit for Toyota 2. 5L 2. 7L 4 cyl Avalon Camry RAV4 13620 36020 Feature: Meet or exceed OEM quality. Strict quality control standards to Build and test. Specifications: Condition: Remanufactured Manufacturer Part Number: 13620 36020 OE OEM Part Number: 13620 0V050, 136200V021, 13620 0V021, 13620 36020, 1362036020, 136200V050 Type: Engine Balance Shaft Fitment 4 cylinder only 1AR FE 2AR FE For Toyota Avalon 2. 5 HYBRID 2013 2018 For

Engine Balance Shaft Fit for Toyota 2.5L 2.7L 4-cyl Avalon Camry RAV4 13620-36020

Feature:
Meet or exceed OEM quality.
Strict quality control standards to Build and test.

Specifications:
Condition: Remanufactured
Manufacturer Part Number: 13620-36020
OE/OEM Part Number: 13620-0V050, 136200V021, 13620-0V021, 13620-36020, 1362036020, 136200V050
Type: Engine Balance Shaft

Fitment：
4-cylinder only
1AR-FE 2AR-FE
For Toyota Avalon 2.5 HYBRID 2013-2018
For Toyota Camry 2.5 2010-2017
For Toyota Highlander 2.7 2010-2019
For Toyota RAV4 2.5 2013-2018
For Toyota Venza 2.7 2013-2015
For Toyota Sienna 2.7 2012-2014
For Scion tC 2.5 2012-2016
For Lexus ES 300h 2013 2014
For Lexus NX 300h 2015
For Lexus ES200, ASV60, AVV60
For Lexus ES250, ASV60, AVV60
For Lexus ES300h, ASV60, AVV60
For Lexus ES350, ASV60, AVV60
For Lexus NX200, AYZ10, AYZ15
For Lexus NX200t, AYZ10, AYZ15
For Lexus NX300h, AYZ10, AYZ15
For Lexus RX270, AGL10, AGL10W
For Lexus RX350, AGL10
For Lexus RX450h, AGL10
For Scion tC, AGT20
For Toyota Alphard, AYH30, AYH30W
For Toyota Aurion, ASV50, AVV50
For Toyota Avalon, AVX40
For Toyota Camry, ASV50, AVV50
For Toyota Harrier, AVU65, AVU65W
For Toyota Highlander, ASU40, ASU50, ASU50L
For Toyota Kluger V, ASU50
For Toyota RAV4, ASA33, ASA38, ASA42, ASA42W, ASA44, AVA42, AVA44
For Toyota Sienna, ASL30
For Toyota Vellfire, AYH30, AYH30W
For Toyota Venza, AGV10, AGV15

Package included:
1 x Engine Balance Shaft

Note:
1.Please check the contents before purchasing!
2.The Oil Pump is designed the professional installer. It does not come with any installation instructions.

Warranty:
Returns: Customers have the right to apply for a return within 60 days after the receipt of the product
24-Hour Expert Online: Solve your installation and product problems

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 71506998362

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 1472 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
erika
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

recommand products

De Forville Barbera d'Asti Ca' del Buc 2019 750
19.99
Arterberry Maresh Pinot Noir 'Weber Vnyd' 2018 750
86.99
Anthill Farms Pinot Noir Campbell Ranch 2020 750
53.99
Diego Conterno Barbera D'Alba 2019 750
24.99
Couly-Dutheil Chinon Blanc "Les Chanteaux" 2019 750
27.99