SKU: 94640383801

Absolute Mesopotamian chronology: From Sargon of Akkad (2243Ð2187) to Nabonidus (556Ð539)

Sale price$32.71 Regular price$36.34
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $9.09 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 20 - Jul 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Absolute Mesopotamian chronology: From Sargon of Akkad (2243Ð2187) to Nabonidus (556Ð539)The 614 Assyrian eponyms between the first year of _am_ Adad I and the first year of Tiglath pileser I (1115 1076) allow us to date approximately the reign of _am_ Adad I (1728 1695). As the Assyrian years were lunar before the reign of Ninurta apil Ekur (1192 1179), this makes it possible to slightly correct the reign of _am_ Adad I (1712 1680), yet as this Amorite king died in the 17th 18th year of King Hammurabi, so this synchronism fixes the

The 614 Assyrian eponyms between the first year of _am_”-Adad I and the first year of Tiglath-pileser I (1115-1076) allow us to date approximately the reign of _am_”-Adad I (1728-1695). As the Assyrian years were lunar before the reign of Ninurta-apil-Ekur (1192-1179), this makes it possible to slightly correct the reign of _am_”-Adad I (1712-1680), yet as this Amorite king died in the 17th/18th year of King Hammurabi, so this synchronism fixes the dating of this Babylonian king (1697-1654). This dating does not correspond to the Middle Chronology but exactly satisfies the astronomical dating of the Ammisaduqa tablet on Venus, according to the Ultra-Low Chronology. In addition, one tablet of astronomical omens (Enuma Anu Enlil 20) mentions a lunar eclipse dated 14 Simanu at the end of the reign of _ulgi (14/III/48, 27 June 1954 BCE), and another (Enuma Anu Enlil 21) mentions a lunar eclipse dated 14 Addaru at the end of the third dynasty Ur, which ended with the reign of Ibbi-Sin (14/XII/24, 6 March 1911 BCE). These two total lunar eclipses are separated by 42 years of reign (= 9 years of Amar-Sin + 9 years of _u-S”n + 24 years of Ibbi-Sin) and 9 months (=XII - III). During the period 2200Ð1850 BCE, there was only one couple of lunar eclipses spaced 42 years and 9 months apart, and visible at Ur, corresponding to the description of the astronomical omens. These two total lunar eclipses confirm the absolute dating of the reign of Hammurabi (1697Ð1654) and allow to anchor the reign of Sargon of Akkad (2243Ð2187). Secondly, as there is a synchronism between Neferhotep I (1701-1690) and Ibni-Addu (1700-1680), the king of Hazor, and another synchronism between Ibni-Addu and Hammurabi (1697-1654), the king of Babylon, this reign could be determined indirectly by carbon-14 and is again in perfect agreement with the ÒUltra-Low chronologyÓ. Finally, the best confirmation of the accuracy of this absolute chronology is the complete reconstitution from 2040 to 1050 BCE, year by year, of the main Mesopotamian chronologies: Uruk IV, Mari, Gutium, Assyria, Elam, Uruk V, Ur III, Larsa, Isin I, Babylon, Hana, Kassite and Sealand, with their synchronisms as well as their dates anchored on astronomical phenomena such as the total eclipses of the moon (Gertoux, NABU 2021-3, 171-172).

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 94640383801

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
timothy higgins
New York, US
★★★★★ 4
Good So Far
Color: 01 - White, Size: Queen (2 Pillowcases)
Don't let my 4-star review dissuade you, as I've had to reassess prior products that initially I thought were great but then failed me in the long term. These are definitely full and plush, you might want to avoid if you prefer slightly thinner support, especially if you are a side sleeper. But so far I find them comfortable and meeting all of my expectations.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026
W
Verified Purchase
Win
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
These Made My Bed Game Stronger
Color: 01 - White, Size: Queen (2 Pillowcases)
These pillowcases impressed me right away. The material feels good in your hands and the stitching looks like it was done right. Soft enough to sleep on comfortably, but not that overly silky soft that gets hot. I’ve washed them several times already and they came out looking the same each time. No shrinkage and no issues with the fit. I sleep pretty still, and honestly I never even think about the pillowcases once I’m out. That tells me everything I need to know. Great value and something I’d buy again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2025
K
Verified Purchase
kimn8r
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect
Color: 01 - White, Size: King (2 Pillowcases)
I never leave reviews, but these pillowcases are great!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Margaret
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Best night's sleep ever
Color: 06 - Aqua Gray, Size: Queen (2 Pillowcases)
ABSOLUTELY the BEST pillows I have ever slept on. My husband hates flat pillows and he absolutely sleeps like a dream on these. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THESE.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 3
Decent Comfort, but Honestly Overpriced for the Quality
Color: 06 - Aqua Gray, Size: King (2 Pillowcases)
I’ve heard a lot of hype about the Beckham Hotel Collection, so I decided to treat myself to this king-size set of luxury sateen pillowcases. Out of the box, they look very nice—the sateen weave gives them a subtle, sophisticated sheen that definitely upgrades the look of the bed. They feel relatively soft to the touch, and the 100% cotton material is breathable enough that I didn't find myself flipping the pillow over for a "cool side" in the middle of the night. However, after using them for a bit, I’m struggling to see where the "luxury" price tag comes from. While they are perfectly functional pillowcases, the quality feels fairly mediocre compared to other 500-thread-count sets I’ve owned in the past. The fabric is a bit thinner than I expected, and after just one or two washes, I noticed some slight fraying around the inner seams. They just don't have that heavy, crisp, high-end hotel feel that the marketing leads you to believe you’re getting. The biggest issue for me is the value proposition. There are plenty of other cotton sateen sets available for a fraction of the cost that offer the same—if not better—durability and softness. These aren't bad pillowcases by any means, but they aren't exceptional either. If I’m paying a premium for a "luxury" brand name, I expect the stitching to be flawless and the fabric to feel substantial, but these feel like standard department store linens. I’m giving these three stars because they do the job and look decent on the bed, but they didn't wow me. If you can find them on a deep discount, they might be worth it, but at full price, I feel like I paid more for the branding than the actual quality of the cotton. I'll keep using them for now, but I won't be rushing out to buy a second set anytime soon.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2025

recommand products