SKU: 74040455570

Sartorius MCA524S-2S00-U QP2 QP4 Cubis II Analytical Balance, with QP2 QP4 software package, 520 g x 0.1 mg

Sale price$6433.64 Regular price$7148.49
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $1787.12 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Sartorius MCA524S-2S00-U QP2 QP4 Cubis II Analytical Balance, with QP2 QP4 software package, 520 g x 0.1 mgThe Sartorius Cubis II MCA is a premium, high performance laboratory balance designed for analytical weighing in research, pharmaceutical, and laboratory applications. It offers unmatched compliance with regulatory standards such as USP, GLP GMP, and 21 CFR Part 11. Cubis II balances provide intuitive touchscreen operation, automatic leveling, automatic internal calibration, and a range of connectivity options for seamless data transfer. Sartorius

The Sartorius Cubis II MCA is a premium, high-performance laboratory balance designed for analytical weighing in research, pharmaceutical, and laboratory applications. It offers unmatched compliance with regulatory standards such as USP, GLP/GMP, and 21 CFR Part 11. Cubis II balances provide intuitive touchscreen operation, automatic leveling, automatic internal calibration, and a range of connectivity options for seamless data transfer. Sartorius Cubis II balances are at the pinnacle of reliability, functionality, and accuracy for analytical weighing.

Features:

Automatic internal calibration (isoCAL)
Internal motorized automatic levelling
7” color touchscreen TFT display in 16:9 format with intuitive user interface
Monolithic weigh cell technology
Fast stabilization times
Overload protection
Lockdown capable to prevent tampering or theft
Custom modularity with thousands of hardware/software applications
Easy connection to PCs for weighing data transfer directly into spreadsheets or documents such as Microsoft® Excel or Word
Pharmaceutical and GxP compliance
21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 compliance with complete traceability
High chemical resistance
CalAudit Trail with automatic documentation of calibration and levelling processes, with date and time stamp
Controlled access to balance settings with User Management
Standard non-verified version for all units
Made in Germany

Draft Shield / Configuration U:

Large manual glass draft shield for precision and analytical balances. It features smooth-action doors that open wide and provide unimpeded access to the weighing chamber without interfering braces.

Software:

QApp Package QP2 (Advanced Applications) & QP4 (Connectivity)

QP2 Advanced Applications: The Advanced software application package includes various complex weighing applications incl. evaluation. This includes applications used for density determination, percentage weighing, counting, backweighing, residual dirt analysis, residue on ignition, filter weighing, checkweighing, formulation, averaging, etc.
QP4 Connectivity: The Connectivity software application package includes applications for data exchange, for example to Windows file server, FTPS, etc.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 74040455570

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S. Langley
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 4
A
This is a great resource. I thought I created great presentations before. Reading this made me realize the mistakes I was making and have me a process for really improving my decks
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2014
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025

recommand products