SKU: 33222464666

Class 66 - GBRF/LTM Black - 66718

Sale price$91.80 Regular price$102.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $25.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 19 - Jul 24

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Class 66 - GBRF/LTM Black - 6671866718 arrived at Newport Docks aboard MV Jumbo Challenger on 9 April 2006. It was one of five locomotives (6671866722) delivered in First GBRf Metronet livery for use in connection with the upgrading of the London Transport sub surface lines. The locomotive was named Gwyneth Dunwoody at Euston on 26 January 2007. Dunwoody was the Labour MP for Crewe and served as Transport Minister. On 5 November 2013 the locomotive emerged from Arlington Fleet

66718 arrived at Newport Docks aboard MV Jumbo Challenger on 9 April 2006. It was one of five locomotives (66718–66722) delivered in First GBRf/Metronet livery for use in connection with the upgrading of the London Transport sub-surface lines.

The locomotive was named “Gwyneth Dunwoody” at Euston on 26 January 2007. Dunwoody was the Labour MP for Crewe and served as Transport Minister.

On 5 November 2013 the locomotive emerged from Arlington Fleet Services at Eastleigh Works in a striking new livery, one of a pair unveiled that day in partnership with the London Transport Museum. The design featured black bodywork covered with brightly coloured London Transport logos. At the same time the locomotive was renamed “Sir Peter Hendy CBE”, recognising the then Commissioner for Transport for London.

After carrying this scheme for a decade, the locomotive returned to Eastleigh in 2023 for refurbishment. It re-emerged in a slightly revised version of the London Transport livery, with minor alterations to the application of warning yellow on the ends, and received a further updated name on Wednesday 24 May 2023.

The locomotive now carries the name “Peter, Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, of Imber in the County of Wiltshire”, reflecting Lord Hendy’s appointment to the House of Lords and his role as Chair of Network Rail. At 57 characters (excluding commas), this is believed to be one of the longest names ever carried by a UK locomotive.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 33222464666

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
superbrain
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
Size seems spot on shoe is beautiful
Size: 12, Color: White
These are beautiful shoes. A great cross between the ubiquitous flat as a board shoes like vans and tennis shoes. More comfortable than the super flat shoes and more formal than sneakers. Very soft leather. Not much arch support and I don't know if an insert would fit well. I am between an 11.5 and 12 in most brands (actual foot length from heel to tip of big toe is 11 and 1/8 inches). These fit perfectly in a 12 with room for comfort. An 11.5 probably would fit but snugly. I do not agree that they should be sized down at least based on my experience. If you can get these for under eighty dollars like I did they are well worth it. I'll be wearing them all summer.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2021
I
Verified Purchase
It's cool.
Houston, US
★★★★★ 4
Weightless, well made. But there are problems with size
Size: 8.5, Color: White
I bought it for a teenager, for size 81/2. This, according to the dimensions on the page, is 25.9 centimeters. They came, the size was indicated correctly, but they are large for the child. Very large. They fit me, size 10. The child is disappointed. Well made, look neat on the foot. Almost weightless But I can't give the maximum rating. I wish the seller to deal with the size grid.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Matthew Gonzales
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Amazing Shoe!
Size: 9 Wide, Color: Blazer Blue Hand Stain
Amazing shoe!! Comfortable to wear for long periods of time! Highly recommend!! 👍🏾
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2025
W
Verified Purchase
William Mantilla
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Calzado elegante para oficina de excelente calidad
Producto de excelente calidad. La entrega fue rápida y el empaque llegó en perfectas condiciones. Cumple completamente con lo descrito en la publicación.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
MH
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 3
Not A Walking Shoe
Size: 9.5, Color: Black/British Tan
In the photo online this shoe looks like it will be very comfortable. Kind of a classy Coach's Shoe. Also in the photo the heel portion of the sole looks thick and supportive. I bought them thinking they would be my go-to travel shoe. Wrong. This is not a comfortable shoe for extended wear. Short durations, OK. The main problem is that the sole is very thin and flexible in all directions. There is no, as in zero arch support, plus that thin heel means that you tend to rock back on your heels and it feels like you're pounding the pavement. I've worn once and I'm very disappointed. They look great, definitely high quality materials, but using them for the intended purpose of travel.... fah get about it. If you're looking for a good looking shoe to wear around the gym and you don't intend to use the treadmill, or elliptical, then this is the shoe you want. They would definitely be returned if I hadn't already worn them outside.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2023

recommand products